Free assessment, no call required

What AI has to work with decides what you get out of it.

AI multiplies whatever system it lands on. Land it on documented, connected processes and it compounds. Land it on tribal knowledge and browser tabs and it produces one clever demo, then quietly stops getting used.

This assessment tells you which of those two situations you are in, which area is weakest, and roughly what the gap is costing you every year. Twenty-two questions, about five minutes.

Start the assessment No card, no call, result on screen

What it measures

Four areas. Each one is a precondition for the next thing working, which is why they are scored separately rather than rolled into a single number.

Process Clarity

Whether the work is described precisely enough to hand to anyone, human or machine. You cannot automate a process nobody has written down.

Founder Dependency

How much of the business runs through one head. This is the number that caps your growth and the one most owners have never priced.

System Readiness

Whether your tools can actually be connected to anything. Good software that cannot export or integrate is a dead end for automation.

AI Practice

Whether AI use is governed and shared, or scattered and personal. Gains that stay with one person do not compound.

The four results

Everyone lands in one of these. The order matters more than the label, because the move that works in one position is usually wasted in another.

The Firefighter

The business runs on you and on memory.

Almost nothing is written down, so almost nothing can be handed over, to a person or to a machine. That is not a failure of effort. It is the normal result of growing fast enough that documenting never made it to the top of the list. The good news is that this is the cheapest position to fix from, because the first few processes you capture will each buy back real hours.

The Experimenter

You have tried the tools. The tools did not stick.

This is the most common place to land and the most frustrating one, because the effort has already been spent. AI did not fail here. It landed on processes that were never defined, so every use was a one-off that needed a person to set it up and check it afterwards. Nothing compounded, so it quietly stopped.

The Operator

The systems are real. The leverage has not been taken yet.

You are further along than most businesses your size. Work is visible, the important processes exist somewhere in writing, and the team does not need you for everything. What you have now is a foundation that AI can actually multiply, which is exactly the point most owners never reach. The gap is no longer clarity, it is that nobody has gone through and asked which of these documented processes should stop being done by a human at all.

The Multiplier

Systems are documented, connected, and starting to compound.

You are in the small minority who did this in the right order. Processes were written before they were automated, tools were chosen for whether they connect, and improvements get shared rather than hoarded. From here the returns are compounding rather than linear, and the risk changes shape. The thing that slows businesses at this stage is not capability, it is governance and drift, meaning documentation quietly going stale and parallel versions of the same workflow appearing in different corners.

Questions about the assessment

What is an AI readiness assessment?

It measures whether a business can actually get value from AI, rather than whether it has bought AI tools. The things that decide that are unglamorous: whether processes are written down, whether the software can be connected to anything, how much of the operation runs through the owner, and whether useful discoveries get shared or stay with one person. A business can be using AI every day and still be unready, because none of it compounds.

How long does the assessment take?

About five minutes. There are twenty-two questions and most of them are one click. Your answers are kept as you go, so you can close the tab and come back to the same place in the same browser session.

Why does it ask how many hours I spend on work someone else could do?

Because that number, multiplied out across a year and priced at what a founder hour is actually worth, is usually the single largest cost in the business and almost nobody has calculated it. The result gives you that figure as a range along with the arithmetic used to reach it, so you can argue with the assumptions rather than take it on faith.

Is this a sales pitch?

The result recommends an audit tier, so yes, there is an offer at the end. The assessment itself still works if you ignore it. You get your score, your weakest area, a cost estimate, and a specific first move, and none of that requires you to buy anything or book a call.

How accurate is the cost estimate?

It is a rough estimate built from what you tell it, which is why it is shown as a range rather than a single number, and it deliberately uses conservative inputs. Forty-six working weeks rather than fifty-two, and only two cost lines rather than every cost that could be argued for. A real audit measures the same things from evidence and interviews rather than recall, and it usually finds the number is higher than the self-assessment suggested.

What happens to my answers?

They are used to generate your result and they come to me. I read them. There is no data sale, no advertising pixel keyed to your responses, and no sequence you cannot leave in one click.