Case study

Planning for 3 to 5 times growth, with every decision still running through the founder

An operations audit I performed, before AI was part of the work. The business is anonymized and described broadly so it can't be identified.

BusinessEnergy services company
Survey42 employees
Planned growth3 to 5 times
ExpansionA dozen or more new states
Audit9 interviews plus a survey

What it cost

The cost, in hours.

Leadership time is the real cost here, so I measured it in hours. Every figure comes from the founder's own estimates and the employee survey.

COST OF ONE BOTTLENECKEstimate
Founder time across five roles50 to 75 hrs a week

5 roles at 10 to 15 hours each. His own estimate.

Expansion admin on one leaderabout 40 hrs a week

The founder's estimate while the company opened new states.

No clear goals below leadership13 of 42

Employees who gave a low score for regular goal setting. The same count gave a low score for KPI targets.

Time the hire he described would freeabout 20 hrs a week

His framing: a hire at about $60,000 that frees about 20 hours of his schedule.

An illustration, not their number: 20 hours × $250 × 52 weeks is $260,000 a year. The $250 rate is mine, the same as the calculator's example.

What the audit found

Five findings behind the numbers.

01

The company waited on the founder for direction

Employees saw the founder as the vision. That meant they waited for direction instead of moving. Leaders were pulled into approvals and problem-solving, and the team leaned on them for decisions they could have made.

The survey said the same thing in its own words. The bottleneck people named most often was the founder being involved in everything, along with a lack of senior talent. Several employees said they got conflicting instructions from different leaders.

02

The founder was running five roles

He described playing five roles at 10 to 15 hours a week each, which is 50 to 75 hours a week of work running through one person. His own conclusion was that someone in the seat for 40 hours a week, even at half the efficiency, could deliver the same results.

03

Expansion paperwork was landing on one leader

Opening new states meant a lot of administration, and it went to one senior person. The founder put it at about 40 hours a week of her time, and the survey listed licensing and jurisdiction questions among the slowest processes. He knew the better use of that time was elsewhere.

04

Goals and KPIs stopped at the top

Of 42 employees, 13 gave a low score for regular goal setting and 13 gave a low score for clear KPI targets. The average for KPI targets, 3.95 out of 5, was one of the lowest in the survey. 14 employees said they did not have regular performance conversations with their manager.

05

The team was strong and the system was missing

In the same survey the team scored 4.62 out of 5 for being committed to quality work and 4.62 for understanding why their role matters. They scored 4.5 for feeling encouraged to innovate and 4.45 for understanding the company vision. The people were not the problem. The company had grown past the structure around them.

What we recommended

Four actions, in this order.

01 North Star

Turn the founder's vision into measurable goals and KPIs for each team, so people can decide without asking.

02 Leadership

Move leadership from control to coaching. Clear roles and decision rights, and feedback loops that let the team own outcomes.

03 Operations leader

An execution-focused VP of Operations with scorecards and accountability, so leadership steps out of the day to day.

04 Hourly value audit

Find the work that sits below each person's highest value and automate it, delegate it or stop it.

Hires to consider

In order of impact and budget: a project manager, an inbound marketing manager, a part-time data analyst and a people operations coordinator.

The 12-month plan

Inspection in week 1. Top bottlenecks handled and the right operator in the role within 90 days. The operator fully executing by month 6.

What I'd automate today

The same audit, with AI doing part of the work.

This section is new. The audit above was an operations audit only. This is what I'd add now that AI tools can carry part of the work.

State expansion tracker

One master company profile, a checklist per state for licensing and filing steps, first drafts of the forms and a deadline tracker. A person reviews each filing.

Weekly scorecards

A one page scorecard per team, assembled each Monday from the systems the team already uses, with a flag wherever a number has no owner.

Meetings to tasks

Transcribe the leadership meeting and turn each decision into a draft task with an owner and a date, for someone to confirm before the meeting ends.

The operator brief

A draft role scorecard and interview questions for the operations hire, built from the audit findings.

Pulse survey summaries

A short quarterly survey with the results summarized automatically, so goal setting and KPI scores can be tracked instead of discovered once a year.

Your version

The $750 audit finds the first three of these in your business and prices each one.

Want this for your business?

The same questions, asked about your work. Fixed price, and you keep everything.